3 ways cordcutters can still watch the Olympics – CNET
The world is watching this summer’s Olympic games…unless you are in the US and don’t pay for a traditional television subscription.
NBC, the network that has the rights to air the international event in the United States, will be offering live internet streams through its website, mobile and television apps — but only if you subscribe directly to a supported television provider such as cable or satellite.
But I — like a growing number of Americans — am forgoing expensive cable subscriptions to be a cordcutter, opting for a wide variety of online streaming options from Netflix, Hulu and YouTube to “skinny bundles” of channels like Sling TV or PlayStation Vue. In fact, I’m paying as much as $50 less than equivalent cable subscription prices that I’ve seen.
However, live events such as the Olympics are exactly the type of watching that still eludes those who have moved all of their television watching to the internet. While some sports organizations offer their own internet-only subscription services such as the WWE Network, NFL Sunday Ticket and MLB.TV, the Olympics are not currently available as part of an a la carte subscription model.
So until the theoretical day comes that NBC offers either its own subscription for the Olympics or finds a way to broadcast them for free online, there are a few ways to get an Olympics fix without committing to a cable or satellite provider:
Buy an antenna, if you have the signal
NBC is one of the “big four” broadcasters, and still has a free over-the-air signal in many parts of the US. (Fox, ABC and CBS — the owner of CNET — are the others.) So, if you live in an area with good reception, nearly any TV can pick up the signal with the addition of a TV antenna. (A notable exception: new 2016 Vizio TVs are among the few models without support for over-the-air TV, but you can buy a compatible DVR or tuner box.)
Antenna prices start dirt cheap for the decent options like the Channel Master Flatenna 35 ($10 directly from Channel Master, closer to $22 with shipping from Amazon). My colleague Ty Pendlebury found that the trade-offs for that antenna’s low price are a short, nonreplaceable cable and plasticky construction, but is otherwise almost as good as slightly costlier options.
The best option he found while testing out eight different indoor antennas was the $39 Antennas Direct ClearStream Eclipse, which pulled in the most channels in our Manhattan location while offering a good mix of features including a detachable cable and a set of sticky pads to attach the antenna to your window or wall.
That said, your mileage for picking up channels may vary based on where you live. In my day-to-day usage of an antenna, there are usually a number of channels I have difficulty picking up. From my apartment in Queens, I just can’t pick up CBS, and my signal for NBC can be unstable. When I lived in the suburbs about an hour’s train ride outside of Manhattan, my indoor antenna could only pick up three channels, and none of them were NBC.
And even if you do have a clear signal for NBC, you will not be able to watch games broadcast on the network’s cable channels, which include Bravo, CNBC, Golf Channel and USA Network.
To get those, you may want to eye two other streaming services…
Try PlayStation Vue or Sling TV
Sling TV and PlayStation Vue both offer streaming alternatives to cable service at prices starting at around $20 and $40 per month, respectively. The services are available for broadband customers on mobile devices and most living room streaming gadgets, including Roku and Fire TV (both), Apple TV and Xbox One (Sling TV) and PS3 and PS4 (Vue, naturally).
PlayStation Vue customers can watch most of the games using the Access tier at $39, or grab the Golf Channel as well using the Core tier at $45. Sling pricing is similar, with the Blue tier at $40 offering everything but the Golf Channel, which comes in the Sports Extra bundle for an additional $5.
PlayStation Vue customers, however, get the added ability to use their log-in in order to access NBC’s website and apps for on-demand viewing on additional devices. Sling currently doesn’t offer that feature.
One other benefit to these services, if you haven’t given them a try yet, is that you may be able to watch most of the Olympics using the free trial period for each of them. Just start with one, cancel when the trial is ending, then sign up for the other. Then after trying both, keep the one you want, or cancel both — there’s no contract, and no long-term commitment.
And if you absolutely must watch the Olympics, and refuse to add additional equipment nor new services into your life, there is a more social option…
Hit the sports bar
While you might not want to pay for the Olympics, perhaps you can instead buy a beer and watch it at a bar that has cable instead. The benefits are obvious: be surrounded by other Olympics fans and cheer for athletes as if you are in Rio. On the other hand, that rowdiness might be why you prefer to stay at home. And your tab for drinks and wings could exceed the monthly streaming service bill mentioned above in one night.
That said, maybe your sports bar is also a PokeStop for Pokemon Go!
What to wish for in 2020
So what would be the most ideal situation for the Olympics to grab cordcutters? Maybe an ad/subscription-supported service that both pays for the service while getting as many Americans watching whether or not they pay for cable? Or (and this will probably never happen) a cable-provided Olympics-only package that cancels by itself after the end of the games? Tell us what you think should be the best, legal way to stream the Olympics come 2020 in the comments.
Jacob Krol contributed to this story.
Write a Reply or Comment:
You must be logged in to post a comment.